Antivirus Performance Comparison

The virus can do a variety of things, from taking over hard disk space to gaining access to your personal data or draining your CPU. Thankfully, there are many antivirus tools available which can help protect your devices and prevent these kinds of issues. It is essential to select an antivirus that has a minimal impact on the system performance. This is the primary factor that all of our antivirus products are tested against. The results are based on how long it takes each application to complete an operation. For example, Kaspersky Security Cloud Free had a background impact of just 6.6% when it was running the full scan, while ESET had a slightly higher impact of 12%.

Avira is a German-based company has a great reputation in our tests. It always scores over 90 percent in all three categories: Protection (False positives) and Performance (False Positives) and Usability. Its UI is also user easy to use avastantivirusreview.com/a-foolproof-guide-to-swarthmore-vpn and comes with a variety of functionality including a smart firewall and a variety of privacy tools. Avira’s subscriptions are priced on a monthly basis, rather than a set 1-3 year period, which makes it much easier to cancel or adjust the subscription at any time without having to worry about 2nd-year renewal price shocks.

Essentware was formerly known as PCKeeper is a fairly new name to our tests. It is a part of the Avira Engine underneath the hood. Overall, it scored well. Its UI is simple to use and its performance was satisfactory this month, though a few stability issues – mostly with scanning jobs locking up – have lowered the rating. The detection was excellent and a perfect run of the certification sets earned VB100.